Claim: “You have everything to lose if you’re wrong about God, so why not believe just in case?

Return to RTC HOME   //   Key: *V* = Any part may be used Verbatim   //  How to Submit and Use and Content
Refutation Links and Multimedia:  Pascal’s Wager Debunked vid 
  • Debater Responses:*V*-“@atheistmel:  If I can fool god into thinking I believe in him when I really don’t, that’s fairly damaging to his credibility as an all-knowing being!”
  • *V*-“@DonQuixote1950: Pascal’s Wager ONLY applies if God is sociopath who demands blind allegiance based on: Bible? Koran? Book of Mormon? Which one?”
  • “@OldRifleman: There are 3,000 of them so far.What if you pick the wrong one?Pascals wager.”
  • “@Peter301164: which god and is this god really easily fooled by dishonest selfish protestations of belief?”
  • *V*-“@tzioneretz: You have everything to lose if you’re wrong about God, so why not believe just in case?”Pascal’s Wager. (1) Would “god” accept such opportunism in lieu of genuine affection? (2) Which of the thousands of “gods” should one believe in, and what if one chooses wrongly? Statistically, the odds of choosing the “correct” “god” are much worse than the odds that no type of “god” exists at all.
  • *V*-“@DonQuixote1950:  Believing in wrong god, just as bad as believing in no god (if only 1 god). BUT there r NO gods! Deal w/it! (Not u, them)”
  •  

Common Sense, Using Ridicule and/or Requiring Proof:

Return to RTC HOME

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s