Claim: “The Bible is an accurate historical document.”

Return to RTC HOME   //   Key: *V* = May be used Verbatim   //  How to Submit and Use and Content
Refutation Links and Multimedia: Nazareth- The Town that Theology Built (vid),  Nailing Jesus – The Man Who Never Was (vid) ,
Debater Responses:

  • *V**DNA is far too complex, to develop by chance. Its proof of Design*“@tzioneretz: Many resources exist that demonstrate how many events — including the historicity of “Jesus” — described in the Bible are either not corroborated by independent sources or greatly deviate from them.”
  • *V*-“Allallt– Burden of proof. To demonstrate this claim you need to take extra-Biblical evidence and line it up against Biblical account to see to what extent they corroborate each other.

    The occasional mistake can be put down to misinterpretation of the evidence (I’ll grant that). But mostly being wrong, or being wrong on big things (like Noah’s flood) demonstrates that it is not historically accurate. Balls in your court.”

Common Sense, Using Ridicule and/or Requiring Proof:

Return to RTC HOME

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s